USUA GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
Working for Pilots on National and Local Issues
No matter what ratings you hold, no matter what type of ultralight you fly, as a pilot in America you will facepublic policy issues and government regulations more often than the average citizen. And, often, your abilityto fly can be affected!
USUA is working full-time to make sure pilots have their say. As a member, you have the nation's most activeultralight aviation advocates representing your interests year round in Washington, D.C. and before a broadrange of government agencies, including FAA. USUA stands up for ultralight aviation on airspacerestrictions, proposed certification of pilots and vehicles, unnecessary airworthiness requirements—everyvital issue facing ultralighters today.
USUA members have said over and over, loudly and clearly, that the current privileges under FAR Part 103should be indefinitely maintained by FAA. On it's members behalf, USUA has taken this message to FAA andstood behind it during the ongoing FAA ultralight rulemaking project to protect the freedoms enjoyed byAmerican ultralighters.
USUA's elected regional representatives keep states covered and monitor local communities, too. Whether itis a possible ban of ultralights at a local airport or the imposition of discriminatory or illegal fees, USUAprotects and defends ultralight interests. Regional Representatives are hard working volunteers who devotetheir personal time and resources to help foster understanding and cooperation within their region.
Legislative Action Organization
If your right to fly for fun is threatened, USUA will swing into action toprotect your freedom. You can make a difference by joining the nation'sstrongest ultralight membership association.
Excerpt from the January 2001 issue of Ultralight Flying! Magazine:
USUA: REGULATORY WATCHDOG
FAA continues to regulate ultralighting under its Code of Federal Regulations as it has since this air sportbecame recognized as a unique and distinct segment of aviation in the late 1970's. Some operations fallwithin Part 103 (Ultralights) and its associated exemptions and advisory circulars while other operations fallunder Parts 61 & 91 (General Aviation rules). The debate continues (heard in some halls of FAA andGeneral Aviation circles as the "ultralight problem") about how to "deal" with this recreational element ofaviation that is foreign in some ways to the traditional focus of air commerce and transportation.
As far back as 1985, USUA has directly been involved with FAA. While the kind of result that would reallyopen up our sport to the general public hasn't been realized yet, USUA has made significant inroads towardenhancing the image of ultralighting, protecting the freedoms we enjoy today.
USUA took the lead when FAA asked the aviation community in 1994 for technical support and advice on a rulemaking project for ultralights. FAA had been working on the process for several years without results. Under the chairmanship of then acting USUA Director of Safety and Training, Tom Gunnarson, a working group was formed within the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) to study FAA's project and develop recommendations.
The ARAC group, composed of a wide diversity of groups representing different interests within ultralightingand general aviation, has met on a regular basis and drafted recommendations that would provideregulatory relief for ultralighters. In recent years the project focus slowly shifted away from ultralighting asFAA continued to encourage modification of existing general aviation regulations.
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee
The Secretary of Transportation and the FAA Administrator created a Departmental Task Force on FAAReform to recommend improvements that could be made in the operations within the FAA itself and betweenthe FAA and the Office of the Secretary. A subgroup of the Task Force was specifically directed torecommend changes that would improve the rulemaking process concerning safety issues. That subgroupproposed the establishment of an advisory committee to serve as a forum for the FAA to obtain input fromoutside the Government on major regulatory issues facing the agency. The Secretary approved the proposalto establish an advisory committee.
Therefore, the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) was established in 1991 to assist the FAAin the rulemaking process by providing input from outside the Federal Government on major regulatoryissues affecting aviation safety. The ARAC includes representations of air carriers, manufacturers, generalaviation, labor groups, universities, associations, airline passenger groups, and the general public.
FAA asked the ARAC to accept a task to review part 103 and to make a recommendation to the ARACconcerning whether new or revised standards were appropriate. On August 30, 1993, the FAA announcedthe formation of an ARAC Working Group. As part of its task the working group was asked to consider apetition to amend part 103 (Docket No. 25591) that had previously been submitted by the United StatesUltralight Association.
Tom Gunnarson, then acting USUA Executive Vice President, was selected to serve as chairman for the working group. The first meeting took place in Washington, DC in October 1993. Over 25 ultralight manufacturers and organizations, and representatives of general aviation interests and government groups were in attendance. After six-year effort the group provided a recommendation to FAA that became known as "Sport Pilot."
Latest Sport Pilot News