DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 1, 21, 43, 45, 61, 65, and 91
[Docket No. FAA-2001-11133; Amendment No. 1-53; 21-85; 43-39; 45-24; 61-110; 65-45; 91-282]
RIN 2120-AH19
Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The FAA is creating a new rule for the manufacture, certification, operation, and maintenance of light-sport aircraft. Light-sport aircraft weigh less than 1,320 pounds (1,430 pounds for aircraft intended for operation on water) and are heavier and faster than ultralight vehicles and include airplanes, gliders, balloons, powered parachutes, weight-shift-control aircraft, and gyroplanes. This action is necessary to address advances in sport and recreational aviation technology, lack of appropriate regulations for existing aircraft, several petitions for rulemaking, and petitions for exemptions from existing regulations. The intended effect of this action is to provide for the manufacture of safe and economical certificated aircraft that exceed the limits currently allowed by ultralight regulation, and to allow operation of these aircraft by certificated pilots for sport and recreation, to carry a passenger, and to conduct flight training and towing in a safe manner.
DATES: Effective September 1, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on airman certification and operational issues (parts 1, 61, and 91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)), contact Susan Gardner, Flight Standards Service, General Aviation and Commercial Division (AFS-800), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone 907-271-2034 or 202-267-8212. .
For
questions on aircraft certification and identification (14 CFR parts 21 and
45), contact Scott Sedgwick, Aircraft Certification Service, Small Airplane
Directorate (ACE-100), Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust Street,
Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone 816-329-2464; fax 816-329-4090; e-mail
9-ACE-AVR-SPORTPILOT-QUESTIONS@faa.gov.
For questions on aircraft
maintenance and repairman certification (14 CFR parts 43 and 65), contact Bill
O’Brien, Aircraft Maintenance Division (AFS-305), Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone
(202) 267-3796.
In addition, information on the implementation of this rule is available on http://AFS600.faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
You can get an electronic copy using the Internet by—
(1) Searching the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) electronic Docket Management System (DMS) Web page (http://dms.dot.gov/search).
(2) Visiting the FAA Office of Rulemaking’s Web page at http://www.faa.gov/avr/arm/index.cfn.
(3) Accessing the Government Printing Office’s Web page at http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/aces140.html.
You can also get a copy by submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9680. Identify the amendment number or docket number of this rulemaking.
You may search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, or labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act statement in the April 11, 2000 Federal Register (65 FR 19477) or at http://dms.dot.gov.
Implementation Information
The FAA spent a considerable amount of time determining the
effective date of the final rule. Based on a review of the planning and
scheduling of the tasks necessary to support the development of the
infrastructure to implement the final rule, the agency believes that it had two
options in determining this date. The first option was to establish the
effective date of the rule after all of the guidance, policy, and
infrastructure was in place to implement the rule. The FAA considered the
economic impact of delaying the implementation of the rule while waiting for
all of this material to be completed and believes that such action would not be
in the best interest of those persons affected by the rule. Additionally, the complexity of the rule and
the interrelationship among many of its new provisions makes the use of more
than a single effective date for the rule difficult to implement. The second option was to select an effective
date shortly after publication of the rule in the Federal Register. The FAA could then provide the public with
many of the benefits of the rule while concurrently carrying out a plan for
implementing other portions of the rule. The plan will contain milestones for
completion of the specific guidance, policy, and infrastructure necessary for
the public to conduct operations and seek certification under the new
regulations. Selection of this option, for example, will permit currently
certificated pilots to take advantage of many of the benefits of the new rule,
such as those provisions relating to the exercise of sport pilot privileges
without the necessity of holding an airman medical certificate. The
infrastructure to implement other provisions of the rule can be developed
during this period.
Due to the agency’s intent to provide the public with as
many of the benefits of the rule as soon as possible, the agency has
established a single effective date of September 1, 2004 for the final rule. Shortly after publication of this rule, the
FAA will post an implementation plan for the rule on the FAA Sport Pilot and
Light-Sport Aircraft Website, http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/
sportpilot or http://AFS600.faa.gov. The FAA recognizes
that persons seeking certification as airmen under the rule or seeking the
certification of light-sport aircraft under the rule will not be able to obtain
such certification immediately after the rule’s effective date. The FAA,
however, will work closely with the sport aviation community and those
organizations that support its members to ensure that each milestone on the
FAA's implementation plan is met and that information regarding implementation
of the rule is made available in a timely manner.
The FAA has also
reissued exemptions to the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), the United
States Ultralight Organization (USUA), and Aero Sports Connection (ASC) that
address flight training in ultralight vehicles. These revised exemptions from
certain provisions of 14 CFR part 103 contain an expiration date of January 31,
2008. This date coincides with the date
established to transition existing ultralight training vehicles, single and
two-place ultralight-like aircraft, and ultralight operators and instructors to
the provisions of the final rule.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996 requires the FAA to comply with small entity requests for information or advice about compliance with statutes and regulations within its jurisdiction. Therefore, any small entity that has a question regarding this document may contact its local FAA official, or the person listed under “FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT” above. You can find out more about SBREFA on the Internet at http://www.faa.gov/avr/arm/sbrefa.htm.
Guide to Terms and Acronyms Frequently Used in This Document
AD—Airworthiness Directive
AGL—Above ground level
AME—Aviation Medical Examiner
ARAC—Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee
ASC-- Aero Sports Connection
ATC—Air traffic control
BAA-- Bilateral Airworthiness Agreement
BASA-- Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement
CAS—Calibrated airspeed
DAR—Designated Airworthiness Representative
DPE—Designated pilot examiner
EAA—Experimental Aircraft Association
Experimental light-sport aircraft—Aircraft issued an experimental
certificate under §21.191 (i)
IFR—Instrument flight rules
LTA—Lighter-than-air
MSL—Mean sea level
NAS—National Airspace System
NM—Nautical mile
NTSB—National Transportation Safety Board
PMA—Parts Manufacturer Approval
SFAR—Special Federal Aviation Regulation
Special light-sport aircraft—Aircraft issued a special
airworthiness certificate in the light-sport category (or, aircraft
issued a special airworthiness certificate under §21.190)
STC—Supplemental type certificate
TC—Type certificate
TSO—Technical Standard Order
Ultralight-like aircraft—An unregistered aircraft that exceeds the parameters of part 103
and meets the definition of “light-sport aircraft”
USUA—United States Ultralight Association
VH—Maximum airspeed in level flight with maximum continuous power
VNE—Maximum never-exceed speed
VS0—Maximum stalling speed or minimum steady flight speed in landing configuration
VS1—Maximum stalling speed or minimum steady flight speed without the use of
lift-enhancing devices
Outline of This Document
I. The Proposed Rule
I.1. NPRM and On-Line Public Forum
I.2. Public Comment Period
I.3. Ex Parte Communications
II. Purpose of This Final Rule
III. General Discussion of Changes in the Final Rule
III.1. FAA Judgment and Discretion
III.2. Summary of Significant Issues Raised By Commenters
III.3. Security Concerns Related to Pilot Identification and Certification
III.4. SFAR No. 89
III.5.A. Comments on Ultralight Vehicles
III.5.B. Future Rulemaking on Ultralight Vehicles
IV. Comparative Tables
V. Section-by-Section Discussion of Comments and Changes Incorporated Into the Final
Rule
V.1. Part 1
V.2. Part 21
V.3. Part 43
V.3.A. Part 43--General Issues
V.3.B. Part 43--Section-by-Section Discussion
V.4. Part 45
V.5. Part 61
V.5.A. Part 61--General Issues
V.5.A.i. SFAR No. 89 Conversion Table
V.5.A.ii. Medical Provisions
V.5.A.iii. Flight Training and Proficiency Requirements
V.5.A.iv. Make and Model Logbook Endorsements, and Sets
of Aircraft
V.5.A.v. Changes to Airspace Restrictions
V.5.A.vi. Changes to Altitude Limitations
V.5.A.vii. Gyroplanes
V.5.A.viii. Demonstration of Aircraft to Perspective Buyers
V.5.A.ix. Category and Class Discussion: FAA Form 8710-11
Submission
V.5.B. Part 61 Section-by-Section Discussion
V.6. Part 65
V.7. Part 91
V.7.A. Part 91--General Issues
V.7.B. Part 91--Section-by-Section Discussion
VI. Plain
Language
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
VIII. International Compatibility
IX. Economic
Assessment
X. Regulatory Flexibility Determination
XI. Trade Impact Analysis
XII. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
XIII. Executive Order 3132, Federalism
XIV.
Environmental Analysis
XV. Energy Impact
XVI. List of Subjects
I. The Proposed Rule
I.1. NPRM and On-Line Public Forum
On February 5, 2002 the FAA published the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), “Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft” (67 FR 5368; Feb. 5, 2002), and requested comments by May 6, 2002. In addition, the FAA held an on-line public forum from April 1, 2002, until April 19, 2002, during which time the FAA posed 15 questions on the Internet. For a description of the on-line public forum and a list of the 15 questions, see the FAA’s announcement published in the Federal Register on March 19, 2002 (67 FR 12826; March 19, 2002). The NPRM and the announcement of the on-line public forum are in the public docket for this rulemaking.
I.2. Public Comment Period
The FAA received over 4,700 comments to the NPRM. Of those, 2,913 were in response to the publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register, and approximately 1,800 additional comments came through the on-line forum. To read the on-line forum comments, go to the electronic docket address given above in the section entitled “Availability of Rulemaking Documents” and view item number 2676 in Docket No. FAA-2001-11133. A detailed discussion of the public’s comments and the FAA’s responses are in “V. Section-by-Section Discussion of Comments and Changes Incorporated Into the Final Rule.”
Most commenters expressed fundamental
agreement with the FAA’s intent in proposing the rule. While there were many comments containing
specific criticisms of the proposed rule and suggestions for how the rule could
be improved, few of the commenters expressed a complete disagreement with the
FAA’s goal of providing for the manufacture of safe and economical aircraft and
to allow operation of these aircraft by the public in a safe manner. Some comments contained numerous specific
suggestions and criticisms, yet were prefaced by a statement of support for the
FAA’s efforts to make aviation more accessible to the general public. It should be noted that, while not
substantial in number, several commenters expressed a fundamental disagreement
with the FAA’s proposed action, based upon a lack of confidence in the
ultralight community. The commenters did
not support these concerns with accompanying data.
I.3. Ex Parte Communications
The FAA worked closely with industry
associations on this rulemaking in a number of ways. FAA staff conducted informational sessions
with interested groups to determine how these rules, if adopted, should best be
implemented. The FAA also assisted
manufacturers in the development of consensus standards for light-sport
aircraft. The Experimental Aircraft
Association (EAA) and others met with the FAA repeatedly to urge the completion
of this rulemaking as quickly as possible so as to meet the public need for
authority to engage in activities permitted under this rule.
On occasion, FAA personnel met with interested
organizations to discuss specific aspects of the NPRM and to determine, based
on information received from these groups, how the NPRM should be
modified. The issues discussed, however,
were also set out in numerous comments to the public docket. These discussions, while of an ex parte
nature, have helped to develop a final rule that is responsive to the
comments. The revisions to the NPRM, as
adopted in this final rule, respond to written and oral concerns raised by
individuals and organizations. This
final rule reflects the FAA’s independent judgment as to the appropriate level
of safety for the manufacture and operation of light-sport aircraft.
II. Purpose of This Rule
The FAA intends this rule to--
· Increase safety in the light-sport aircraft community by closing the gaps in existing regulations and by accommodating new advances in technology.
· Provide for the manufacture of light-sport aircraft that are safe for their intended operations.
· Allow operation of light-sport aircraft exceeding the limits of ultralight vehicles operated under 14 CFR part 103, with a passenger and for flight training, rental, and towing.
· Establish training and certification requirements for repairman (light-sport aircraft) to maintain and inspect light-sport aircraft.
The rule is designed to allow individuals to experience sport and recreational aviation in a manner that is safe for the intended operations, but not overly burdensome. By bringing these individuals under a new regulatory framework, the FAA believes this rule lays the groundwork for enhancing safety in the light-sport aircraft category.
This rule does not change existing aircraft certification or maintenance regulations for aircraft already issued an airworthiness certificate, such as a standard, primary, or special certificate (e.g., experimental amateur-built and experimental exhibition aircraft). However, as discussed in the section-by-section preamble discussion for §1.1, Definition of Light-Sport Aircraft, a sport pilot can operate an aircraft meeting the light-sport aircraft definition in §1.1, regardless of the airworthiness certificate issued. In addition, this rule does not change existing part 103 requirements.
A more detailed discussion and justification for the rule can be found in the preamble to the NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 5, 2002. On page 5370 of that Federal Register publication, is a section entitled “Effects of the Proposal on the Public and Industry” that gives answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs). These questions and answers have been updated on the FAA’s website (http://faa.gov/avr/afs/sportpilot and click on FAQs) to reflect the changes being adopted in this final rule.
III. General Discussion of Changes in the Final
Rule
III.1. FAA Judgment and Discretion
As the following summary reflects, commenters provided a variety of suggestions for the rule. As discussed more completely in the section-by-section discussions that follow, the FAA carefully considered the comments. Besides the specific issues in the comments, the FAA weighed two factors in adopting, modifying, or rejecting the comments.
First, the FAA is making decisions in a new area for regulation. Although some experience exists in similar aircraft, the rule anticipates growth and change in the industry. There are areas where only time and experience will determine whether these regulatory provisions meet the FAA’s expectations or require modification. There is room for debate and disagreement, and the FAA is prepared to make changes when appropriate. But in the FAA’s judgment, these standards strike a balance in favor of safety while allowing freedom to operate.
Second, there are situations where a line must be drawn. For example, the case can be made that the maximum weight or speed could be somewhat higher or lower than what is being adopted. In these situations, the FAA is not establishing this rule with the intent of including or excluding specific aircraft. Instead, the FAA is trying to objectively determine where the line should be drawn while considering the appropriate level of safety and the complexity of the operation.
III.2. Summary of Significant Issues Raised By
Commenters
While most commenters expressed a desire to see some aspect of the proposed rule revised, they either agreed with the proposed regulation overall or agreed with the intent of the proposal. Most commenters believed the proposal would succeed if revised to address the issues they identified.
Significant issues raised by commenters are listed below, with reference to the corresponding proposal. These issues account for approximately 80 percent of the comments. They, and other comments on the NPRM, are discussed in detail under “V. Section-by-Section Discussion of Comments and Changes Incorporated Into the Final Rule.”
· Towing: 1,298 comments
a. Prohibition of towing of hangliders and paragliders by ultralight pilots; part 103--691 comments
b. Prohibition of towing of hangliders and paragliders by light-sport aircraft; SFAR No. 89 section 73(b)(12)--607 comments
· Section 1.1 definition of “light-sport aircraft”--122 comments
· Maximum weight limits for light-sport aircraft; §1.1 definition of “light-sport aircraft” paragraph (1)--489 comments
· Maximum speed in level flight under maximum continuous power for light-sport aircraft; §1.1 definition of “light-sport aircraft” paragraph (2)--141 comments
· Maximum stall speed limits for light-sport aircraft; §1.1 definition of “light-sport aircraft” paragraph (4)--62 comments
· Fixed or ground-adjustable propellers and repositionable landing gear on light-sport aircraft; §1.1 definition of “light-sport aircraft” paragraphs (8) and (11)--116 comments
· Sport pilot certification (general comments on SFAR No. 89)--653 comments
· Maximum speed limit on student pilot operation of light-sport aircraft; SFAR No. 89 section 35(e)--57 comments